Skip to main content

Full text of "To the shareholders of the Royal Canadian Bank [microform] : on the 13th April, I ventured to address you, privately and confidentially, respecting the management and affairs of the Royal Canadian Bank ..."

See other formats


IMAGE  EVALUATION 
TEST  TARGET  (MT-3) 


1.0 


I.I 


■iillM   1125 


u 
1-  ,. 

UUI. 


1.8 


11.25 

1.4 

J4 

"^ 6"     — 

► 

v> 


<^ 


/i 


/ 


V] 


.^>.  ^'»'/ 


6* 


y. 


'c*^  ♦/ 


?> 


'/ 


VA 


Photographic 

Sciences 

Corporation 


33  WEST  MAIN  STREET 

WEBSTER,  N.Y.  14580 

(716)  872-4503 


4^ 


\ 


iV 


\\ 


V 


^ 


;\ 


1^  ^. 


■  0*  % 


CIHM/ICMH 
Microfiche 


CIHM/ICIVIH 
Collection  de 
microfiches. 


Canadian  Institute  for  Historical  Microreproductions  /  Institut  Canadian  de  microreproductions  historiques 


Technical  and  Bibliographic  Notes/Notes  techniques  et  bibliographiques 


The  Institute  has  attempted  to  obtain  the  best 
original  copy  available  for  filming.  Features  of  this 
copy  which  may  be  bibliographically  unique, 
which  may  alter  any  of  the  images  in  the 
reproduction,  or  which  may  significantly  change 
the  usual  method  of  filming,  are  checked  below. 


L'Institut  a  microfilm^  le  meilleur  exemplaire 
qu'il  lui  a  dtd  possible  de  se  procurer.  Les  details 
de  cet  exemplaire  qui  sont  peut-dtre  uniques  du 
point  de  vue  bibliographique,  qui  peuvent  modifier 
une  image  reproduite,  ou  qui  peuvent  exiger  une 
modification  dans  la  m^thode  normale  de  filmage 
sont  indiquds  ci-dessous. 


□    Coloured  covers/ 
Couverture  de  couleur 


□    Coloured  pages/ 
Pages  de  couleur 


□    Covers  damaged/ 
Couverture  endommagde 


□    Pages  damaged/ 
Pages  endommagdes 


n 
n 

D 
D 
D 


Covers  restored  and/or  laminated/ 
Couverture  restaurde  et/ou  peiliculde 


i^  Cover  title  missing/ 
Le  titre  de  couverture  manque 


Coloured  maps/ 

Cartes  g6ographiques  en  couleur 


Coloured  ink  (i.e.  other  than  blue  or  black)/ 
Encre  de  couleur  (i.e.  autre  que  bleue  ou  noire) 


Coloured  plates  and/or  illustrations/ 
Planches  et/ou  illustrations  en  couleur 

Bound  with  other  material/ 
Reli6  avec  d'autres  documents 


[■"K'Pages  restored  and/or  laminated/ 
1^1    Pages  restaurdes  et/ou  pellicul^es 

|~~7r  Pages  discoloured,  stained  or  foxed/ 
'^      Pages  d^color^es,  tachet^es  ou  piqu6es 


□Pages  detached/ 
Pages  d^tachdes 


r~7^  Showthrough/ 
i I   Transparence 


D 
D 


Quality  of  print  varies/ 
Qualiti  indgale  de  I'impression 

Includes  supplementary  material/ 
Comprend  du  materiel  supplementaire 


D 


D 


Tight  minding  may  cause  shadows  or  distortion 
along  interior  margin/ 

Lareliure  serr^u  peut  causer  de  I'ombre  ou  de  la 
distortion  le  long  de  la  marge  intdrieure 

Blank  leaves  added  during  restoration  may 
appear  within  the  text.  Whenever  possible,  these 
have  been  omitted  from  filming/ 
II  se  peut  que  certaines  pages  blanches  ajouties 
lors  d'une  restauration  apparaissent  dans  le  texte, 
mais,  lorsque  cela  dtait  possible,  ces  pages  n'ont 
pas  6t6  filmdes. 


n 


Only  edition  available/ 

Seule  Edition  disponible  ^ 

Pages  wholly  or  partially  obscured  by  errata 
slips,  tissues,  etc.,  have  been  refilmed  to 
ensure  the  best  possible  image/ 
Les  pages  totalement  ou  partiellement 
obscurcies  par  un  feuillet  d'errata,  une  pelure, 
etc.,  ont  6t6  film§es  d  nouvsau  de  facon  d 
obtenir  la  meilleure  image  possible. 


r~l(  Additional  comments:/ 

LlJ    Commentaires  suppl^mentaires; 


Creases  in  pages  may  cause  distortion  of  print. 


This  item  is  filmed  at  the  reduction  ratio  checked  below/ 

Ce  document  est  film6  au  taux  de  reduction  indiqud  ci-dessous. 

10X  14X  18X  22X 


26X 


30X 


y 


12X 


16X 


20X 


24X 


28X 


32X 


The  copy  filmed  here  has  been  reproduced  thanks 
to  the  generosity  of: 

Metropolitan  Toronto  Library 
Business  Department 


L'exemplaire  film6  fut  reproduit  gr&ce  d  la 
g6n6rosit6  de: 

iVIetropolitan  Toronto  Library 
Business  Department 


The  images  appearing  here  are  the  best  quality 
possible  considering  the  condition  and  legibility 
of  the  original  copy  and  in  keeping  with  the 
filming  contract  specifications. 


Les  images  suivantes  ont  6t6  reproduites  avec  le 
plus  grand  soin,  compte  tenu  de  la  condition  at 
do  la  nettetd  de  l'exemplaire  filmd,  et  en 
conformit6  avec  les  conditions  du  contrat  de 
filmage. 


Original  copies  in  printed  paper  covers  are  filmed 
beginning  with  the  front  cover  and  ending  on 
the  last  page  with  a  printed  or  illustrated  impres- 
sion, or  the  back  cover  when  appropriate.  All 
other  original  copies  are  filmed  beginning  on  the 
first  page  with  a  printed  or  illustrated  impres- 
sion, and  ending  on  the  last  page  with  a  printed 
or  illustrated  impression. 


Les  exemplaires  originaux  dont  la  couverture  en 
papier  est  imprimde  sont  filmds  en  commen^ant 
par  le  premier  plat  et  en  terminant  soit  par  la 
dernidre  page  qui  comporte  une  empreinte 
d'impression  ou  d'illustration,  soit  par  le  second 
plat,  selon  le  cas.  Tous  les  autres  exemplaires 
originaux  sont  film6s  en  commengant  par  la 
premidre  page  qui  comporte  une  empreinte 
d'impression  ou  d'illustration  et  en  terminant  par 
la  dernidre  page  qui  comporte  une  telle 
empreinte. 


The  lasv  recorded  frame  on  aach  microfiche 
shall  contain  the  symbol  —»>  (meaning  "CON- 
TINUED "),  or  the  symbol  V  (meaning  "END"), 
whichever  applies. 


Un  des  symboles  suivants  apparaitra  sur  la 
dernidre  image  de  cheque  microfiche,  selon  le 
cas:  le  symbole  ^»>  signifie  "A  SUIVRE",  le 
symbole  V  signifie  "FIN". 


Maps,  plates,  charts,  etc.,  may  be  filmed  at 
different  reduction  ratios.  Those  too  large  to  be 
entirely  included  in  one  exposure  are  filmed 
beginning  in  the  upper  left  hand  corner,  left  to 
right  and  top  to  bottom,  as  many  frames  as 
required.  The  following  diagrams  illustrate  the 
method: 


Les  cartes,  planches,  tableaux,  etc.,  peuvent  dtre 
filmds  d  des  taux  de  reduction  diffdrents. 
Lorsque  le  document  est  trop  grand  pour  dtre 
reproduit  en  un  seul  clich6,  il  est  film6  i  partir 
de  i'angle  supdriour  gauche,  de  gauche  d  droite, 
et  de  haut  en  bas,  en  prenant  le  nombre 
d'images  ndcessaire.  Les  diagrammes  suivants 
illustrent  la  mdthode. 


1 

2 

3 

32X 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

fe??^VV-i#«:Wi*'4''#**-»*'ai«*?Sii«*^ 


•wj^f>-r  n^mtrm: 


"~^: 


'J 


4 


:«fl*^ 


i 


'^ 


3r/3  2.a.C. 


i'i«Hli1lilimMtHnniit)rf**<ji«<tHtefe, 


^ 


I  QUKEX    STllKKT    WKHT, 

i  TdliONTo,  l.ltli  May,  18G9. 

■  !■         To  flie  Skircholden  of  llie  liuijal  CuiuuUitii  Bank: —  .  ,  .  .,,,.,1,  ,.  ,      .  , 

nKNTI.KMEN, 

Oil  tlic  13tli  April,  1  vciiturc'il  to  addiT.ss  you,  pihati'ly  ami  ''oiitidi'iitially,  ifspcctiiiy  the  iiiiiiiagcniciit  and 
affairs  of  the  Koyal  Canadian  Bank.  I  wrote  as  a  Shareholder  to  Shareholders,  with  no  intention  of  enlisting 
the  pnblic  in  the  controversy.  The  other  Directors,  in  their  associate  capacity,  and  the  late  President  individnally, 
have  issued  circnlars  in  reply,  marked  like  mine,  "])rivate  and  confidential,"  hut  unlike  mine,  so  used  as  to  invest' 
the  matter  with  a  iiublic  character.  For  the  apjiearance  of  the  correspondence  thej',  not  I,  nnist  he  held  respon- 
sible ;  and  if  in  its  pi'ogress,  it  assume  a  more  disagreeable  complexion  than  the  sincere  friends  of  the  l?ank  <l('sire,, 
the  circumstance  will  be  attributable  to  them  and  them  alone.  Afy  desire  was  to  eschi^w  personalities.  In  their 
anger  at  my  criticism  they  have  indul;;ed  freely  in  inneiido  and  abuse.  You  are  the  judges  between  us,  and  l)y 
your  verdict  upon  this  point  I  am  content  to  abide. 

Let  me  say,  before  proceeding  further,  that  the  unworthy  weapons  emiiloyeil  by  my  ass.ailants  will  not  deter 
me  from  the  performance  of  what  has  become  a  duty.  1  am  willing  that  eveiy  statement  jtresented  in  my  last 
shall  be  subjected  to  searching  scrutiny,  and  if  I  liavi;  misrepresented  the  condition  of  the  [}ank  or  maligned  it.s 
management,  I  siuiU  not  ho[ie  to  escape  your  cens\ire.  Hut  I  demand  evidence,  and  will  not  accept  calumny  in 
its  nlace.  I  linv<!  set  forth  what  I  know  to  be  facts,  and  I  call  for  facts  in  reply.  You,  1  am  confident,  under- 
stiand  too  well  the  matters  in  issue  to  allow  your  attention  io  be  turned  asiilt;  liy  vituperation  directed  against 
myself.  In  the  contest  which  has  begun,  the  inteicsts  at  stake  are  those  of  tlu;  Hank  ;  and  concerning  these,  the 
gentlemen  who  control  its  management  have;  little  or  nothing  to  say. 

\'ou  cannot  ha\t'  failed  to  observe  that  with  regard  to  the  traiiactions  of  tlie  IJank  with  Mr.  "W.  U.  Ihowri, 
and  afterwards  with  Messrs.  IJrown  iV  Chewett,  the  circular  of  tlu"  Directors  is  silent.  They  do  rmt  altempt 
d(!nial  or  explanation  of  the  serious  accusations  I  have  preferred.  Even  the  late  President,  who,  without  consul- 
tation with  the  IJoard,  fiist  entered  into  the  arrangement  with  Mr.  Brown,  even  he  does  not  challengt\  a  single 
essential  fact.  It  is  of  lu)  avail  for  him  to  declare  that  I  "was  advised  and  knew  of  I5rown's  transa'tions 
and  arrangements  with  the  Bank."  I  rejieat,  1  h;id  no  knowledge  of  .Mr.  Smith's  arrangement  witli  .Mr.  iirown, 
jior  that  the  latter  had  a  credit,  until  after  the  disclosures  conse(pient  on  tlh'  arrest  of  Mr.  Chewett.  Mr.  Smith 
does  not  assert  that  either  his  arrangement  with  Mr.  Brown,  or  Mr.  Jletcalfe's  arrangenuMit  witii  Brown  ami 
Chewett  ever  came  before  the  Board.  In  each  case  the  Pi'csident  act''  \  on  his  own  rcsponsil)ility,  not  only  with- 
out submitting  his  action  for  ratification  by  the  Directors,  but  without  rejjorting  the  existence  of  the  arrangement.' 
So  far  as  I  know,  the  first  intinuition  the  Board,  as  .such,  had  of  transactions  which  resulted  so  disastrously  was 
subsequent  to  Brown  and  Chewctt's  failure.  What  "Oath"  Mr.  Smith  may  be  able  to  procure  on  the  subject, 
1  neither  know  noi'  care.  Ofthe  pnjceedings  ot  tin;  Board  the  minutes  are  evidSiice,  and  by  the  minutes  let  lutf 
be  judged. 

Touching  the  Cobourg,  Seaforth  and  Kingston  agencies,  my  opponents  are  m(jre  positive,  but  their  positive- 
ness  is  confined  to  comparatively  innnaterial  points.  Referring  to  Cobourg,  the  Diiectors  remark  :  '•  It  is  not 
correct  that  the  appointment  of  Mr.  W'allace  was  made  against  the  remonstrance  of  Jlr.  McDonald,"  in  proof  of 
which  they  cite  the  fact  that  I  was  n(jt  jjresent  at  the  time  when  the  appointment  was  made,  nor  at  several  suc- 
ceeding meetings.  But  this  is  an  evasion.  The  subject  of  the  appointment  was  discussed  at  the  Board  before 
the  datt^  of  the  ajipointment  itself,  and  on  those  occasions  I  jjrotested  against  it ;  in  one  instance  citing  a  remark 
of  the  Honorable  iMr.  Perry,  that  if  Wallace  were  appointed  the  Bank  would  "make  a  snuishing  businesgs."  At 
that  meeting  the  Cashier  replied  that  if  Wallace  followed  his  instructions  no  loss  could  arise  ;  and  if  he  did  not 
tbllow  them  he  would  hi'  dismissed.  Wallace  did  m)t  follow  his  instructions  and  was  not,  as  he  shoidd  have  been, 
at  once  dismissed.  Ilr.  Smith  says  that  tlu?  "  temj)orary  contiiuiance  "  of  Wallace,  which  he  suggested,  Avas 
for  the  purpose  of  securing  some  large  amounts  which  would  have  been  jeopardized  by  his  sudden  dismissal,  and 
which  suggestion  the  Board  concurred  in."  I  was  not  present  when  this  concurrence  was  given,  and  I  regard  the 
reason  assigned  for  it  as  a  pretext  for  extending  further  help  to  parties  indebted  to  the  Bank.  At  any  rate,  the 
"  temporary  continuance"  was  not  justified  by  the  result.  The  books  shew  that  instead  of  "  .securing  some  largo 
amounts"  the  action  of  Mr.  Smith  was  followed  by  an  almost  total  los.s.  Increased  advances  led  to  increased 
end)arrassment. 

The  Directors'  statement  in  relation  to  the  Seaforth  Agency  is  that  "it  is  not  correct  either  that  Mr.  McDon- 
ald proposed  the  dismissal  of  Mr.  Ku.ssell,  the  agent,  or  that  the  Board  (pialified  the  motion,  with  a  proviso  giving 
Mr.  Russell  time  to  adjust  his  accounts."  They  atld,  "there  was  no  such  motion."  The  motion  in  question  was 
introduced  by  myself  several  weeks  before  the  <lisnussal  took  place.  I  proposed  simply  that  Mr.  Russell  bo 
dismissed.  Air.  Smith  objected,  on  th<>  gnnind  that  there  was  nothing  against  Russell.  I  pointed  out  the 
un.satisfactory  nature  of  his  accounts,  and  was  met  by  Mr.  Smith  with  the  remark  that  I  wished  to  "hang  a  man 
first  and  try  him  afterward."  An  adtlition  was  suggested,  that  the  dismissal  take  efft'ct  so  soon  as  his  accounts 
were  adjusted,  and  in  this  shape  the  motion  passed  unanimously.  Mr.  Smith  now  insists  that  my  re)>res(!ntation 
of  the  case,  hi  its  bearing  upon  himself,  is  "pure  fabrication,  having  no  foundation  whatever  in  fact,  the  result  of 
a  personal  enmity,"  and  so  forth.  Ofthe  value  of  this  declaration  you  will  be  better  able  to  judge,  when  I  shew 
the  peculiai-  relation  existing  between  Mr.  Smith,  the  President,  and  Mr.  Russell,  the  defaulting  agent,  as  I  shall 
do  before  ch)sing  this  letter. 

Of  the  Kingston  agency,  the  Directors  observe,  "the  Cashier  was  the  first  to  direct  attention  to  the  inegu- 
larities  there."  If  he  was  satisfied  that  irregularities  existed,  it  was  his  duty  to  send  the  Inspector  at  once,  whicli 
he  neglected  to  do,  although  that  officer  was  and  is  subject  to  his  direction.  Undoubtedly  the  affairs  of  the 
agency  came  before  the  Committee  on  Agencies  in  the  regular  course  of  investigation,  and  what  I  drd  in  the 


2 


il 


matter  was  done  as  a  member  of  that  comiuittee.  But  how  does  this  circiiiiistance  affect  my  original  statement  ? 
I  claimed  no  special  credit  in  the  premises.  I  only  culled  your  attention  to  t'lo  fact  that  the  affairs  of  the  agency 
had  been  grossly  mismanaged,  and  that  culpable  delays  occurred  in  the  application  of  remedies.  Mr.  Smith  says 
1  do  not  "dare"  to  connect  his  name  directly  with  the  irregularities  complained  of.  J  "dare"  to  say  that  the  a^ent 
was  a  confidential  correspondent  of  Mr.  Smith,  and  acted  for  him  in  procuring  itroxies  in  support  of  his  policy  ; 
and,  moreover,  that  the  relation  thus  existing  was  the  occasion  of  reluctance  on  the  part  of  Mr.  Metcalfe  in  dealing 
with  the  agency. 

You  are  told  "  it  is  not  correct  that  Mr.  McDonald  was  compelled  to  abandon  the  investigation  undertaken  by 
the  Committee  on  Agencies."  I  reiterate  my  assertion  that  I  abandoned  the  task  because  obstacles  wero  thrown 
in  the  way  of  such  an  investigation  as  the  case  required,  and  because  I  found  a  majority  of  the  Board  supporting 
the  measures  of  the  late  President.  The  Directors  declare  "  There  was  no  such  division."  Well,  let  me  give  an 
instance.  After  the  Board  became  acquainted  with  the  Brown  &  Chewett  arrangement,  I  moved  a  vote  of  cen- 
sure upon  the  late  President  for  having  granted  the  original  credit,  and  that  motion  was  not  even  seconded. 
Again,  when  the  affairs  of  the  Cobourg  Age.icy  were  under  discussion,  Messrs.  Metcalfe  &  Manning,  as  well  as 
myself,  expressed  disappointment  that  the  expectations  held  out  by  Mr.  Smith  in  recommending  a  certain  course 
had  not  been  realized.  Tliis  was  in  the  Committee  on  Agencies.  When  the  subject  came  before  the  Board,  the 
reference  was  objected  to,  and  was  expunged  against  my  vote.     Are  not  these  evidences  of  division  t 

Much  is  said  concerning  my  motives,  wliich  are  assailed  both  by  the  Directors  and  Mr.  Smith.  Both  allege 
that  my  difference  with  the  Board  dates  from  the  rejection  of  a  proposal  for  my  own  advantage  which  I  am 
alleged  to  have  made.  The  Directors'  version,  that  "  Mr.  McDonald,  a  short  time  since,  made  a  proposal  to  the 
Board  which,  in  the  interest  of  the  Stockholders,  the  members  present  unanimously  felt  bound  to  decline."  From 
that  time,  they  go  on  to  say,  "  the  undersigned  observed  a  marked  change  in  his  conduct  towards  all  the  members 
of  the  Board."  Mr.  Smith's  story  is,  that  on  the  29th  January  last,  I  applied  for  a  loan  of  $100,000,  which  1 
wanted  "  for  the  purpose  of  investing  in  one  of  the  most  dangerous  enterjjrises  in  the  United  States,"  and  the 
refusal  of  which  is  the  cause  of  my  present  action.  What  are  the  facts  ?  Homotime  previous  to  the  date  men- 
tioned, a  gentleman  of  high  cluaracter  and  standing  in  this  comnumity  invited  me  to  take  an  interest  in  a  large 
enterprise,  which  seemed  to  him  to  promise  great  pecuniary  results.  The  operation  required  considerable  banking 
accommodation,  and  I  promised  him  that  I  would  speak  to  the  Officers  of  the  Bank,  and  ascertain  if  the  advance 
could  be  conveniently  made.  The  officers  told  me  there  was  a  large  amount  of  idle  funds,  and  that  the  proposition 
should  be  submitted  to  the  Board.  Of  the  nature  of  the  enterprise,  I  am  not  at'  liberty  to  speak.  I  may  say, 
however,  that  it  is  in  all  respects  legitimate,  that  I  did  not  commit  myself  to  it  either  in  my  intercourse  with  the 
gentleman  or  my  communicaticn  to  the  Board,  and  that  I  assured  both  that  if  thA  .Bank  entertained  the  proposi- 
tion, before  availing  myself  of  it,  I  should  personally  investigate  the  nierits  of  the  project,  and  form  my  own 
judgment  as  to  its  probable  advantages.  I  further  informed  the  Board  that  in  the  event  of  the  accommodation 
oeing  required,  I  should  bind  Inyself  to  furnish  adequate  security  for  every  dollar  loaned.  In  a  proposal  so  made, 
and  accompanied  with  such  conditions,  I  see  nothing  irregular,  nothing  incompatihle  tvith  the  interests  of  the 
Stockholders,  and  nothing  of  which  I  have  any  reason  to  be  ashamed.  True,  the  Board  declined  the  proposal. 
But  the  President  subsequently  offered,  on  his  own  authority,  to  let  me  have  the  $100,000  if  I  would  spread  the 
amount  over  three  weeks  !  The  whole  matter,  however,  had  been  dismissed  from  my  mind,  and  I  declined  his 
oftbr. 

Th6  supposition  that  this  affair  was  the  beginning  of  my  difference  with  the  Boa-d,  is  an  effort  of  the  Dir- 
Sctors'  imagination.  At  no  time  during  my  conection  with  the  Bank  has  there  been  agreeable  relations  between 
myself  and  some  members  of  the  Board.  With  Mr.  Smith,  especially,  I  have  steadily  refused  to  act.  With 
Messrs  Metcalfe  and  Manning  there  was  no  interruption  of  amicable  intercourse,  until  the  issue  of  my  circular. 
Indeed  these  gentlemen  associated  themselves  with  me,  in  March,  in  a  j>lan  for  the  purchase  of  the  Toronto 
Street  Railway.  But,  declare  the  Directors,  I  "next  endeavoured,  under  threat  of  issuing  a  circular  to  gain  a 
personal  advantage,  coupled  with  a  promise"  that  if  my  offer  were  accepted,  my  "lips  would  be  sealed."  I  cannot 
recall  any  incident  which  can  be  tortured  into  a  basis  for  this  calumny.  This  I  remember : — The  discussions  at  the 
Board,  consequent  upon  the  Brown-Chewett  revelation,  induced  n.e  more  than  once  to  remark  that  I  should  find 
myself  compelled  to  appeal  to  the  Sha'-eholders  as  against  the  management  of  the  Bank.  This  is  the  only  "threat" 
with  which  I  am  truly  chargeable.  Out  of  the  Board,  the  President  and  the  Cjvshier  maintaineil  that  the  position 
of  the  Bank  was  better  than  I  described  it ;  that  not  only  was  the  stock  intact,  but  that  means  were  on  hand  to 
pay  a  dividend  out  of  profits.  I  renewed  the  conversation  on  the  17th  or  18th  of  April ;  observing  to  the  Cash- 
ier that  if  he  could  satisfy  me  of  the  accuracy  of  his  representations,  I  should  confess  myself  mistaken,  and  with- 
draw from  the  Board  and  the  Bank,  of  course  t<aking  my  interest  with  me.  The  wortli  of  the  stock  was  spoken 
of,  and  I  said  that  if  the  Cashier's  view  were  tenable,  the  stock  should  sell  at  par,  plus  a  proportion  of  the  con- 
templated dividend,  and  that  at  this  rate,  1  for  one,  was  quite  prepared  to  sell.  At  the  time  I  insisted  that  the  real 
state  of  affairs  was  unfavorable — that  not  only  wivs  the  Bank  not  in  a  condition  to  declare  a  dividend,  but  that  its 
reserve,  or  most  of  it,  had  been  swept  away,  -Mil  disaster  could  be  averted  only  by  the  interference  of  the  Share- 
holders, and  the  introduction  of  other  management.  The  Cashier  requested  me  at  least  to  delay  the  circulation 
of  my  circular,  which,  as  the  date  shews,  was  then  ii;  type,  in  order  that  the  Bank  might  realize  its  advances  on 

f)roduce.  In  support  of  this  request,  he  stated  that  the  Bank  had  already  suffered  seriously  from  th**  want  of  pub- 
ic confidence  ;  the  run  produced  by  the  Brown-Chewett  disclosures  and  the  Taylor  failure  having  drained  the 
Bank  of  nearly  a  million  dollars  in  gold.  I  complied  with  the  request  so  far  as  to  delay  the  issue  until  the  27th 
of  April  J  though  ot  the  necessity  of  the  sweeping  change,  I  desired  to  bring  about  the  Cashier's  confession  was 
conclusive  proof.     Beyond  these  conversations,  these  statements  and  counter  statements,  these  declarations  pro  and 


vlk'v'4i^!AkLH'. 


mwmm 


JV^i-:: 


'-•s^ 


i;3K<r"!''^|BEr 


w 


allege 


con,  nothing  occurred  or  was  hinted  at,  looking  to  any  compromise  or  arrangement  as  between  myself  and  the 
Board. 

Mr.  Smith  has  another  explanation  of  my  position.  Ho  seeks  beyond  the  date  fixed  by  the  Directors  for 
the  commencement  of  my  opposition  and  traces  it  to  July  last.  "  The  first  cause  of  his  (my)  real  discontent  was 
the  fact  that  he  (I)  was  not  elected  President  in  July  last  when  my  (Mr.  Smitli's)  term  :»f  office  expired."  How 
little  reason  I  had  to  be  dissatisfied  with  the  action  of  the  Shareholders  on  the  occasion  referred  to,  the  result  of 
the  voting  will  best  explain.     Tims  th>3  list  stood  : 

Donald  McDonald 4,0.")2  votes. 

William  Barber 3,916  " 

James  Metcalfe 3,702  " 

R  A.  Harrison 3,202  " 

Alex.  Manning 2,926  " 

A.M.Smith 2,924  " 

J.Crombie 2,800  " 

So  decided  an  expression  of  confidence  on  the  part  of  the  Shareholders  left  ino  nothing  to  desire.  With  the 
subsequent  election  of  Mr.  Metcalfe  to  the  Presidency  by  the  Board  I  avowed  myself  dissatisfied,  because  that 
gentleman  was  then  heavily  indebted  to  the  Bank  ;  and  I  contended  that  the  chief  executive  of  such  an  institution 
should  not  be  one  of  its  debtors.  Mr.  Metcalfe  deprecated  criticism  or  opposition  on  the  ground  that,  having  been 
cliosen  President,  he  could  niit  retire  before  the  expiration  of  the  year  without  prejudice  to  his  interests. 

One  other  point  raised  afresh  by  the  Directors  and  Mr.  Smith  requires  attention.  The  Directors  inform  you 
that  it  is  not  correct  that  returns  to  the  Government  have  been  so  manipulated  as  to  conceal  lot  is.  "  Tlie.=c 
returns,"  they  assert,  "  have  been  prepared  by  the  proper  officers  of  the  Bank,  and  are  correct."  Mr.  Smith, 
also,  has  "  no  doubt "  that  the  monthly  returns  were  correctly  prepared.  Now,  returns  to  the  Goviirnment,  to 
be  trustworthy,  should  exhibit  precisely  the  position  of  the  Bank's  affairs.  The  statement  of  afdcts,  for  example, 
sliould  include  only  those  which  have  a  hona-fidt  existence.  But  the  returns  of  the  Royal  Canjidian  Bank  have 
exhibited  assets  without  deducting  losses  actually  experienced.  Thus,  the  indebtedness  of  men  known  to  be 
insolvent  haa  been  used  to  swell  the  volume  of  reported  assets.  The  President  and  the  Cashier  in  the  conversa- 
tion of  the  17th  April,  admitted  losses  to  the  extent  of  $200,000,  which  amount  had  not  been  deducted 
ftom  the  aggregate  of  assets  returned  to  the  Government.  My  estimate  of  the  bisses  far  exceeds  these  figures. 
I  know  that  the  losses  at  one  agency,  which  the  President  and  Cashiei*  put  down  at  $20,000,  really  run  up  to 
twice  that  sum ;  and  though  Ather  of  their  representations  may  not  be  so  far  from  Jjie  truth,  I  am  convinced  that 
they  fall  considerably  short  of  the  reality. 

But,  says  Mr.  Smith,  "any  unbiassed  reader  will  plainly  see  Mr.  McDonald  had  the  remedy  in  his  own  hand 
— in  no  instance  was  information  withheld  from  the  Board."  Undoubtedly  certain  books  are  placed  on  the  table 
when  the  Directors  meet,  butitheir  time  during  the  brief  sitting  is  occupied  with  matters  which  render  personal 
inspection  of  the  books  practioally  impossible.  Nor,  were  the  case  otherwise,  is  it  the  business  of  the  Directors  to 
institute  a  scrutiny  into  the  records  at  every  meeting.  It  is  the  duty  of  the  President  to  report  to  them  the  true 
state  of  affairs;  to  inform  them  of  new  arrangements,  and  to  take  their  opinion  as  to  matters  that  are  pending  or 
in  contemplation.  My  complaint  is  that  neither  the  late  nor  the  present  President  performed  this  duty — that 
neither  accustomed  himself  to  consult  the  Board  with  reference  to  credits  granted  or  applied  for,  or  even  to  report 
losses,  until  they  had  become  desperate.  In  short,  both  of  these  gentlemen  have  uniformly  acted  on  the  idea  that 
the  President  may  do  as  he  pleases,  and  that  the  Directors  are  entitled  only  to  such  information  as  he  may  choose 
to  give  them. 

I  have  now  noticed  in  detail  the  various  allegations  with  which  the  Directors  and  the  late  President  have 
attempted  to  break  the  force  of  my  criticism  on  their  management.  You  will  agree  with  me,  I  think,  in  the 
opinion  that  their  denials  and  so-called  explanations  amount  to  little.  Not  one  of  my  statements  have  they 
disproved.  They  have  touched  them  only  to  reveal  their  inability  to  justify  the  proceedings  exposed.  Their 
allusions  to  my  private  aft'airs  are  as  untrue  in  their  scope  and  aim  as  they  are  mean  and  malignant  in  spirit ;  and 
I  have  no  apprehension  that  they  will  divert  your  attention  from  the  grave  averments  contained  in  my  former 
circular,  not  one  of  which  have  these  gentlemen  ventured  to  assail. 

Let  me  remind  you  of  the  matters  which  my  assailants  have  passed  in  most  suggestive  silence.  I  have 
charged  that  tlie  Bank  has  accorded  large  and  unprotected  credits  to  individuals  limited  in  resources  and  engaged 
in  irregular  and  hazardous  transactions ;  that  of  these  credits  the  Board  were  ignorant,  having  no  opportunity  of 
judging  of  them  at  the  time  and  no  means  of  averting  their  consequences ;  that  tlie  Board  have  been  kept  unin- 
formed of  all  important  business  ;  that  the  President  for  the  time  being,  has  asserted  absolute  authority,  claiming  to 
be  sole  judge  of  credits  to  be  given  and  sole  manager  of  the  business ;  and  that  the  result  of  this  method  of  managing 
has  been  attended  with  disastrous  results.  I  have  charged,  also,  that  the  evils  of  this  management  have  been 
conspicuous  in  the  affairs  of  the  agencies  ;  that  speculative  and  otherwise  improper  transactions  have  been  allowed 
to  go  on  unchecked  ;  that  agents  have  been  allowed,  on  their  own  responsibility,  to  make  advances  to  persons  of 
doubtful  credit,  and  to  engage  in  operations  which  efficient  supervision  would  have  rendered  impossible ;  that,  as 
a  consequence,  serious  losses  have  been  experienced  by  the  Bank.  Finally,  I  have  alleged  that  this  bad  manage- 
ment is  worse  than  a  mere  error  of  judgment — worse  than  bad  faith  to  the  Directors,  who  are  supposed  to  share 
its  responsibilities ;  that  it  is  a  wrong  to  the  shareholders,  and  calls  for  their  early  and  effective  interference.  To 
these  allegations,  specific  and  emphatic  as  they  are,  the  six  gentlemen  who  have  tried  to  abuse  and  slander  me 
into  silence,  offer  not  one  syllable  in  reply.     They  pay  your  discernment  the  poor  compliment  of  supposing  that 


"mimim 


••'i»meinmttmnm.»j(Mm>m>>t>a>  ■ 


i 


you  will  fail  to  (liscriininatc  between  private  attacks  upon  myself  and  a  refutation  of  my  charges,  or  an  explanation 
that  would  uiitif.'atf  their  effect.  ^ 

And  who  are  my  assailants  that  they  should  arraif,'n  me  under  the  pretence  of  guardin{j;  the  interests  of  the 
Shareholders  !  What  are  their  relations  to  the  ]5ank  that  they  should  talk  to  youiot  my  private  affairs  |  I  will 
answer  huth  (piestions  hy  the  statement  of  a  single  fact.  Of  all  the  memhers  of  the, Board,  the  President  included, 
I  alone  do  n(  1  owe  the  Jiank  a  dollar.  I  was  the  only  one  of  the  nuniber  not  injlebtetl  to  the  Bank  at  the  date 
of  the  election  last  duly.     1  am  the  oidy  one  not  indehted  to  it  now. 

Again,  v.hat,  until  recently,  were  the  relations  of  my  assailants,  each  to  the  others  (  I  shall  best  explain  by 
laying  ])ef(ire  you  passages  from  certain  correspondence  between  tlu!  late  President  and  the  then  Agent  at  Sea- 
forth  -the  defaulting,  and  now  .absconding  liussell— which  correspondence  was  obtaine<l  after  his  arrival  at 
Ciiicago.      I  shall  ((Uote  enough  to  shew  you   how   zealously   Mr.  Smith  labored  to  prevent  the  election  of  the 


nuijority  of  the  present  li<iard,^iid  how  highly  he  valued  them  as  associates, 
have  the  following  :^  "-i;!,;^-  ^__ 


'.My 


li'nider  date  June  ;i4th,  1808,  we 

I: 

Dkak  KlssKl.l,, 

Wliat  are  yon  dniii^'  in  re  proxicH  for  tlio  iiiiiiual  mt'i'tiuy  ''     1  liave  not  received  any  from  yon.     I  « ill  recjuiru  all  yo\i  can 
iilt'd  on  sonu-  chwigeH  at  the  Hoanl,  and  on  that  account  wU  have  to  oncouiit*r  some  opi)oHition  myself.     I  rely  on 


HcnJ  nil',  as  I  liave  d 

you  b'l'ttiuK  nie  all  you  can 


Send  them  m  blank,  or  filled  in  my  own  name,  an  you  may  think  l)e»t.j 


Yours  truly, 
(Sifemed)        A.  M.  SMITH. 


Five  days  later,  June  2'.)th,  Mr.  Smith  wrote  thus  to  the  same  person  : 


Mv  Dk.vu  Sin, 

I  have  youri  of 
reciuire  them 
Air.  ]{os..i. 


...      „ .  ■  in  re  proxies,  &e.,  for  wliicli  I  am  uiueh  obliged.     (j!o  on  .and  get  all  that  vou  can,  an  I  fancy  I  will 

I  have  heard  from  .Mr.Whiti-'head.  Could  you  not  see  him,  andtiuietly  ml)  him  up  tin  m.atters  that  yim  inuKt  know  ;  alno 
Mr.  McDonahl  ha-i  been  up  there,  and  I  understand  han  been  tellinu'  the  natives  ho  Ik  to  be  next  I*renident,  &c.  Thin  I 
would  be  f,'lad  to  second  un<ter  any  other  cireuniKtaiiccs,  but  the  interest  of  those  Stoekholderti  who  have  taken  stock  tn  my  account,  and 
the  fact  th.at  I  hold  more  j)aid  up  .stock  than  all  the  Hoard  together  tliat  is  some  reason  why  I  should  not  trust  the  affairs  of  the  J5auk 
to  the  sweet  mercies  of  NVoodsiile  anil  Manning.  Xo  one  can  or  could  regret  more  than  1  do  thia  Unfortunate  affair,  but  I  would  not  be 
(leMerving  the  name  of  a  man  if  I  did  not  at  least  try  to  counteract  this  attempt  to  place  the  affaintof  the  Jlank  in  tl  e  ))OWPr  of  the  two 
men  above  nu'Utioued,  aiul  who,  in  my  opinion,  is  utterly  unfit ;  at  any  rate  so  say  many  here.  I^et  me  have  a  note  from  you  through 
the  week.     AddreHs  me  i)rivate,  not  iw  President.     Yours,  &c., 

(Signed)        A.  M.  SMITH. 


Of  these  efforts  to  nujuld  the  Board  according  to  Mr.  Smith's  will,  his  colleagies  were  not  umiware.  They, 
too,  exerted  themselves  to  procure  proxies,  with  a  result  adverse  to  Mr.  Smit  I's  plans,  as  the  ^'oting  already 
referred  to  sufficiently  proves,  .After  the  eli^ction,  under  date  July  IQtb,  Mr.  ^iiaith;  atldressing  "  My  Dear 
Russell,"  wrote  :  "^ •    ,.■      •  .^^  

"  I  have  to  tV.ank  you  f(U'  the  jid-oxies  kindly  sent  to  me,  which  I  made  the  best  use  we  could  of.      We  did  not  succeed  in  putting  in 
all  the  men  we  wanted,  or  rather,  in  putting  out  those  I  did  not  want."  &c.,  &c. 

Among  those  whom  Mr.  Smith  desired  to  elect,  but  did  not  succeed  in  electing,  was  Mr.  W.  C.  Chewett,  of 
Brown's  Bank,  for  whom  2,.'')92  votes  were  cast. 

It  was  in  the  mid.st  of  this  contest  for  Director.ships  ami  for  the  Presidency  that  the  then  Board  for  the  first 
time  learned  of  Mr.  ?;  .tcalfe's  indebtedness  to  the  Bank  on  a  Bill  of  Exchange  on  England  for  ($ifl,000)  Forty 

thousand  dollars,  cashed  on  tlu; but  I'eturned  dishonon-d  on  the ,  and  which,  though  in  the 

Bank,  stood  on  the  books  in  the  account  of  Foreign  Exchange,  as  if  that  amount  were  at  the  credit  of  the 
Bank  in  England,  available  to  be  drawn  against.  ]\Ii'.  Smith's  object  in  lunnasking  the  transactio:i  may  be 
imagined  ;  mine,  in  alluding  to  it  here,  is  to  enable  you  to  aov.  that  the  books,  which  we  are  told,  were  always 
acces.sible  to  me,  do  not  invariably  exhibit  the  actual  nature  and  position  of  affairs.  In  this  case  they  would  show 
$40,000  to  the  credit  of  Foreign  Exchanges  ;  whereas  the  bill  was  lying  in  the  vault  of  the  Bank  dishonored.  an<l 
had  been  there  the  greater  portion  of  a  year. 

My  task  is  tilmost  finished.  I  have  portrajed  the  evil ;  it  is  for  you  to  apply  tlu!  remedy.  My  purpose  will 
be  accomplished  if  I  succeed  in  convincing  you  of  the  necessity  of  prompt  and  decided  action  on  your  part  to  re- 
organise the  management  of  the  Bank,  overhaul  its  affairs,  and  invest  the  control  in  men  wholly  unconnected 
with  the  present  Board,  and  in  no  manner  subject  to  the  demoralising  influences  which  now  prevail.  Do  not 
transfer  your  power  incautiously.  My  six  opponents  profess  a  willingness  to  relinquish  their  positions  ;  it  will  be  for 
you  to  take  care  that  under  the  guise  of  retiring  they  do  lot  merely  give  place  to  their  own  nominees,  who  would 
but  perpetuate  their  policj".  The  efforts  in  progress  to  obtain  proxies  renders  this  warning  necessary.  Keep  your 
votes,  at  least  for  the  present,  and  when  you  do  give  proxies,  let  it  be  to  parties  whom  you  know  to  be  uncon- 
nected with  the  present  Board,  and  untrammelled  Ity  obligations  to  the  Bank.  Concerted  action  will  be  desirable, 
perhaps  requisite,  to  secure  the  desired  end. 

I  shall  be  pardoned  for  adding  that,  in  conjunction  with  a  radical  change  in  the  management,  you  should  in 
my  opinion  cause  to  be  instituted  a  thorough  investigation  into  the  affairs  of  the  Bank,  by  parties  of  experience 
and  character  in  banking,  and  in  no  way  related  to  the  Board  or  its  ofiUcers.  Only  by  this  proceeding  will  it  be 
possible  to  ascertain  the  entire  truth. 


;!■' 


U.:r.ll-.  .ii   !.Mriii)i(/)k,  ■•■•,!]  fjii'if^  ,6*10i, 

■  'l  .  .'L.  -fjti'iMi  •.'vilj'yfi  >  hjw; 
•)i((  vAnu-U  111!/:  "Miuffl  r.j  h'ihi 
u:>'l,i^{\]r<n[(V'-,  1'  'r  tini!( 


.1  I  ui  l-'.r.  ,I(t  ■  ;m  Itiiri't! 


For  seme  time  yet  my  address  will  be  at  the  Senate,  Ottawa.  ' 

vi  I  remain,       ,y !,j,i.  1o  -jr  ir,  rmnc  r.  luul  I 
Your  obedient  servant, 

DONALD  Mcdonald 


'i(ift«j5,'jt" 


.i» 


-/.'■'.  •jili  . 
•  •  i 


■V'i' 


li'fi-CiHjKiT  )»n 
itl'>!i»;  ifJifi 


' 


f,,0^t^m«t».-m'' 


mmmtti 


'•ifH'f^f.  ^  _ 


■*j 


I 


l>.dbtl^^^A*M 


>^viM  ('"T^^"  vrim 


TiJ  ."Oiymmw  *ifii